The prompt
Score 10 of 10, Excellent
Use it when You have research notes and figures and need an evidence-led white paper that explains a problem and an approach, not a sales brochure.
- {{research_notes}}
- {{data}}
- {{topic}}
- {{readers}}
- {{organization}}
- {{length}}
- {{house_style}}
Full prompt and why it works
System prompt
You write white papers for business and policy readers from the author's own research and data. Here a white paper is an evidence-led document that explains a problem and an approach; it is not a sales brochure. You trace every figure to the material and never invent data, sources or quotes.
User message
<research_notes> {{research_notes}} </research_notes> <data> {{data}} </data> <brief> Topic and working title: {{topic}} Readers and what they will use it for: {{readers}} Our organization and its interest in the topic: {{organization}} Length: {{length}} House style or required sections: {{house_style}} </brief> Write a white paper from the research notes and data above, for {{readers}}, so that they come away understanding the problem, what the evidence shows and what a sound approach looks like, and can judge the argument on its evidence rather than on our word. Use these sections: 1. Executive summary: up to 200 words with the problem, the main findings and the implications. 2. The problem: what is happening, for whom, and why it matters now, with figures from the data. 3. What the evidence shows: each finding with its figures and source, and what the evidence cannot tell us. 4. Approach: the approach the research supports, with its conditions and trade-offs. Describe it in general terms first; mention our product or service once at most, factually, if it fits. 5. Implications: what readers should consider or do, by type of reader if there are several. 6. Method and sources: how the research and data were gathered, with sample sizes, dates and limitations. Keep to {{length}}. The writing should be clear, measured and specific, the way an expert explains a topic to a capable reader, with headings, short paragraphs and a table wherever figures need comparing. <example> The form of a finding: "Of the [number] firms surveyed in [period], [share] said late supplier data delayed their monthly close (survey, section 2 of the data)." This shows the form only; use the real figures. </example> Rules: - Every figure must appear in the data or notes, with its period and unit. Do not round in a way that changes the meaning, and do not combine figures from different sources into a new statistic. - Do not add studies, experts, quotes or market figures from outside the material. - Keep correlation and cause apart: write "was associated with" unless the material shows a cause. - Avoid sales language, superlatives and any claim that our approach is the only one. If the evidence does not support a point the brief expects, say so in the paper rather than stretching the data. Mark any figure you cannot trace to a specific line with [SOURCE?], and end with a list of every figure used and where it came from.
Variables
- {{research_notes}}
- Your research notes: interviews, literature you have read, observations, with sources.
- {{data}}
- Your figures and tables, with periods, units, sample sizes and where they come from.
- {{topic}}
- The topic and a working title.
- {{readers}}
- Who will read it and what for, for example "finance directors deciding whether to change their close process".
- {{organization}}
- Who is publishing it and why the topic matters to you.
- {{length}}
- For example "3,000 to 4,000 words" or "eight pages".
- {{house_style}}
- Required sections or style rules, or "none".
Why it works
- What to avoid. Every figure must trace to the material with its period and unit, and no new statistic may be built by combining sources, which is how white papers lose credibility.
- What good looks like. Readers should be able to judge the argument on its evidence, so the paper says what the evidence cannot show and mentions the publisher's offer once at most.
- If unsure. Untraceable figures are marked [SOURCE?], and a point the evidence does not support is stated as such rather than stretched to fit the brief.