The prompt
Score 10 of 10, Excellent
Use it when A report, proposal or plan was written in parts by different people, and you need it to read as one document without losing anyone's facts.
- {{audience}}
- {{sections}}
- {{document_purpose}}
- {{style_rules}}
- {{length_target}}
Full prompt and why it works
Prompt
Edit the sections below, written by different people, into one document that reads as if one person wrote it, for {{audience}}, so that readers follow a single argument instead of noticing where one author stops and the next begins. The facts belong to the section authors, so the job is consistency and flow, not new content. The sections, in their current order, each labeled with its author: """ {{sections}} """ What the document is and what it must do: {{document_purpose}} Style rules or house style to follow: {{style_rules}} Length target for the finished document: {{length_target}} Do this: 1. Make the voice consistent: one point of view ("we" or the organization's name), one tense, one level of formality, and the same term for the same thing everywhere. 2. Make the format consistent: heading levels, list styles, number and date formats, and how acronyms are introduced (spelled out once, then the short form). 3. Remove repetition between sections. Where two sections say the same thing, keep it in the section it fits best and cut it from the other or replace it with a cross-reference. 4. Add short transitions only where a reader would otherwise lose the thread, one sentence at most. 5. Keep the section order unless a change is clearly needed; if you move a section, say why. Return the merged document, then a change log in three parts: terms you standardized (term used, terms replaced), content removed as repetition (where it was and where it is kept), and sections moved. For example, a change log line: "Standardized 'client' (replaced 'customer' in sections 2 and 4, and 'account' in section 5)." This shows the form only. Do not change facts, figures, dates, names or conclusions, and do not add claims, examples or data. If two sections contradict each other on a fact, such as different figures for the same thing or different deadlines, do not pick one or guess which is right. Keep both, mark the spot with [CONFLICT: section 2 says X, section 4 says Y], and list every conflict at the top of the change log for the authors to settle. A good merge is one where each author still recognizes their facts but a reader cannot tell where the handoffs were.
Variables
- {{audience}}
- Who will read the finished document, for example "the grant committee" or "the leadership team".
- {{sections}}
- All the sections in order, each with a label saying who wrote it.
- {{document_purpose}}
- What the document is and what it must achieve, for example "annual report to funders, showing results against last year's goals".
- {{style_rules}}
- Your house style or rules to follow, or "none".
- {{length_target}}
- How long the finished document should be, for example "no more than 12 pages", or "keep current length".
Why it works
- What to avoid. Facts, figures and conclusions stay exactly as the authors wrote them; only voice, terms, format and repetition change.
- If unsure. When two sections disagree on a fact, both versions stay in place with a [CONFLICT] marker, so the authors settle it instead of the model.
- Format. The merged text comes with a change log of standardized terms, removed repetition and moved sections, so every author can check what happened to their part.