thinkhard.SI

Prompt repository Research & learning

Write a public comment on a proposed regulation

An agency has proposed a rule that affects you, and you want to submit a specific, evidenced comment before the deadline that asks for concrete changes.

Registry no.
RES-046
Collection
Research & learning
Laid out for
Claude
Score
10 out of 10
Blanks to fill
6

Research & learningClaude

The prompt

Score 10 of 10, Excellent

Use it when An agency has proposed a rule that affects you, and you want to submit a specific, evidenced comment before the deadline that asks for concrete changes.

  • {{rule_text}}
  • {{evidence}}
  • {{commenter}}
  • {{docket}}
  • {{position}}
  • {{length_limit}}
Full prompt and why it works
System prompt
You help organizations and individuals write public comments on proposed regulations. You make specific, evidence-based arguments tied to the exact provisions of the proposal, and you never misstate what the proposal says or invent data to support a point.
User message
<proposed_rule>
{{rule_text}}
</proposed_rule>

<our_evidence>
{{evidence}}
</our_evidence>

<commenter>
Who we are and why the rule affects us: {{commenter}}
Agency, docket number and any other reference the notice asks for: {{docket}}
Our position, overall and on each provision we care about: {{position}}
Length limit, if any: {{length_limit}}
</commenter>

Write a public comment on the proposed rule above, for the agency staff who must read and respond to comments, so that they can see exactly which provisions we address, what we ask them to change and the evidence behind each request. Agencies weigh the substance of a comment rather than how many people send the same view, so specific provisions, evidence and workable alternatives count for more than strong language.

Use this structure:
1. Heading block with the agency, docket number and title of the proposal, exactly as given.
2. Introduction: who we are, our stake in the rule, and a short summary of our requests.
3. Comments by provision: for each provision, a heading with its section number and a short title, a quote of the relevant text, our position, the evidence and reasoning from our material, and the specific change we request, with suggested wording where we can offer it.
4. Answers to any questions the agency asked in the notice that our material can address.
5. Conclusion: our requests as a numbered list.

Keep it within the length limit, or under 2,000 words if none is given. The tone should be measured and professional, the way an expert writes to a careful reader.

<example>
The form of a request: "We ask the agency to change the reporting deadline in section [number] from [proposed period] to [requested period], because [evidence from our material]." This shows the form only.
</example>

<rules>
- Quote and cite only provisions in the proposed rule text above, with their numbers as written.
- Use only our evidence. Do not add statistics, studies, costs or legal arguments; where a point needs support we have not given, write [EVIDENCE NEEDED: what].
- Leave out confidential business information, personal details and anything we would not want published, because comments are usually made public; flag anything in our material that looks sensitive.
- Do not claim the rule is unlawful; if we want to make a legal argument, mark the place [FOR COUNSEL].
</rules>

If our position on a provision is unclear or missing, list the provision under "Positions to confirm" after the comment rather than taking one for us.

Variables

{{rule_text}}
The proposed rule text, or the sections you are commenting on, with their numbers, and any questions the agency asked.
{{evidence}}
Your evidence: data, costs, examples from your operations, studies you have read, with sources.
{{commenter}}
Who you are and how the rule affects you, for example "a trade association of 40 regional carriers".
{{docket}}
The agency, docket number and any reference the notice asks commenters to include.
{{position}}
Your overall view and what you want on each provision.
{{length_limit}}
Any length limit, or "none".

Why it works

  • Who it's for. It is written for agency staff who must respond to the substance of each comment, so every request is tied to a provision and to evidence.
  • What to avoid. Only provisions in the pasted rule and only your evidence, with [EVIDENCE NEEDED] where support is missing, because a misquoted rule or an unsupported figure undoes the comment.
  • If unsure. Unclear positions go to a "Positions to confirm" list, and legal arguments are marked for counsel instead of being asserted.

How to use it

  1. Press Fill in blanks and type your details into each blank. What you type stays in this browser.
  2. Copy the filled prompt into the AI tool you already use, such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, or open it in the Grader or the Prompt Tester here.
  3. Before you rely on it, try it on three or four real examples. The Prompt Tester runs them all at once and shows which ones go wrong.
Use it from code

Get this prompt as JSON from the free REST API, with your own text in the blanks, or let an AI assistant fetch it through the MCP server. No key.

curl -s https://thinkhard.si/api/v1/prompts/public-comment-on-regulation

With the MCP server added to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or VS Code, call get_prompt with {"prompt": "public-comment-on-regulation"}, or just ask for it by name.