The prompt
Score 10 of 10, Excellent
Use it when Your performance review has a rating or comments you think are wrong, and you want a calm written response based on facts to submit or bring to a meeting.
- {{review_text}}
- {{evidence}}
- {{disagreement}}
- {{desired_outcome}}
- {{process}}
- {{recipient}}
- {{word_limit}}
- {{max_points}}
Full prompt and why it works
You help employees respond to performance reviews they disagree with. You keep the response factual, calm and specific, and you rely only on the evidence the person provides.
<review> {{review_text}} </review> <my_evidence> {{evidence}} </my_evidence> <context> What I disagree with most, and what I accept: {{disagreement}} What I want to happen (rating changed, a comment corrected, my response added to the file, a meeting): {{desired_outcome}} Our process for responding, if there is one, and the deadline: {{process}} </context> Write a written response to the review above, for me to send to {{recipient}}, so that the points I disagree with are on the record with evidence and my request is clear. It may go into my personnel file and be read by HR or a future manager, so it should read as professional and fair to someone who was not involved. Structure: 1. Opening: two sentences that acknowledge the review and say I want to respond to specific points. 2. What I agree with, briefly, so the response is clearly not a blanket rejection. 3. Each point I disagree with: quote the review's words, then give the facts from my evidence that show a different picture, with dates and sources. One short paragraph per point. 4. My request: what I am asking for, in one or two sentences. 5. Close: willingness to discuss it in a meeting. Keep it under {{word_limit}} words and address at most {{max_points}} points, the strongest ones, because a long list of objections reads as defensive. <example> The form of one point: "The review says I 'missed several deadlines in Q3'. The project tracker shows two of my eleven Q3 deliverables were late, both after the scope change approved on [date], which I raised in my email of [date]." </example> Avoid accusing my manager of bias or bad faith, emotional language, and comparisons with named colleagues. Do not overstate my evidence or add facts I have not given. If my evidence does not support a point I disagree with, tell me so in a note above the draft and leave that point out, because a weak point weakens the strong ones. This is not legal advice: if my notes mention discrimination, retaliation or a legal claim, add a note that I may want to speak to HR or an employment lawyer before sending.
Variables
- {{review_text}}
- The review as written, including ratings and comments.
- {{evidence}}
- Facts that support your view: emails, tracker data, results, feedback from others, with dates.
- {{disagreement}}
- What you disagree with most and what you think is fair.
- {{desired_outcome}}
- What you want to happen, for example "rating moved from 2 to 3, or my response added to the file".
- {{process}}
- How responses work where you are and any deadline. Write "not sure" if you do not know.
- {{recipient}}
- Who receives it, for example "my manager, copied to HR".
- {{word_limit}}
- The maximum length, for example 500.
- {{max_points}}
- The most points to dispute, for example 3.
Why it works
- Background facts. Each point quotes the review's own words and answers them with dated evidence, which is what a reader in HR can weigh.
- If unsure. A disagreement your evidence does not support is flagged and left out, so it cannot weaken the points that hold up.
- What to avoid. No accusations of bias, no emotion and no named colleagues, with a pointer to HR or a lawyer if a legal issue is in play.