thinkhard.SI

Prompt repository Job search & careers

Respond in writing to a performance review you disagree with

Your performance review has a rating or comments you think are wrong, and you want a calm written response based on facts to submit or bring to a meeting.

Registry no.
CAR-034
Collection
Job search & careers
Laid out for
Claude
Score
10 out of 10
Blanks to fill
8
Added

Job search & careersClaude

The prompt

Score 10 of 10, Excellent

Use it when Your performance review has a rating or comments you think are wrong, and you want a calm written response based on facts to submit or bring to a meeting.

  • {{review_text}}
  • {{evidence}}
  • {{disagreement}}
  • {{desired_outcome}}
  • {{process}}
  • {{recipient}}
  • {{word_limit}}
  • {{max_points}}
Full prompt and why it works
System prompt
You help employees respond to performance reviews they disagree with. You keep the response factual, calm and specific, and you rely only on the evidence the person provides.
User message
<review>
{{review_text}}
</review>

<my_evidence>
{{evidence}}
</my_evidence>

<context>
What I disagree with most, and what I accept: {{disagreement}}
What I want to happen (rating changed, a comment corrected, my response added to the file, a meeting): {{desired_outcome}}
Our process for responding, if there is one, and the deadline: {{process}}
</context>

Write a written response to the review above, for me to send to {{recipient}}, so that the points I disagree with are on the record with evidence and my request is clear. It may go into my personnel file and be read by HR or a future manager, so it should read as professional and fair to someone who was not involved.

Structure:
1. Opening: two sentences that acknowledge the review and say I want to respond to specific points.
2. What I agree with, briefly, so the response is clearly not a blanket rejection.
3. Each point I disagree with: quote the review's words, then give the facts from my evidence that show a different picture, with dates and sources. One short paragraph per point.
4. My request: what I am asking for, in one or two sentences.
5. Close: willingness to discuss it in a meeting.

Keep it under {{word_limit}} words and address at most {{max_points}} points, the strongest ones, because a long list of objections reads as defensive.

<example>
The form of one point: "The review says I 'missed several deadlines in Q3'. The project tracker shows two of my eleven Q3 deliverables were late, both after the scope change approved on [date], which I raised in my email of [date]."
</example>

Avoid accusing my manager of bias or bad faith, emotional language, and comparisons with named colleagues. Do not overstate my evidence or add facts I have not given. If my evidence does not support a point I disagree with, tell me so in a note above the draft and leave that point out, because a weak point weakens the strong ones. This is not legal advice: if my notes mention discrimination, retaliation or a legal claim, add a note that I may want to speak to HR or an employment lawyer before sending.

Variables

{{review_text}}
The review as written, including ratings and comments.
{{evidence}}
Facts that support your view: emails, tracker data, results, feedback from others, with dates.
{{disagreement}}
What you disagree with most and what you think is fair.
{{desired_outcome}}
What you want to happen, for example "rating moved from 2 to 3, or my response added to the file".
{{process}}
How responses work where you are and any deadline. Write "not sure" if you do not know.
{{recipient}}
Who receives it, for example "my manager, copied to HR".
{{word_limit}}
The maximum length, for example 500.
{{max_points}}
The most points to dispute, for example 3.

Why it works

  • Background facts. Each point quotes the review's own words and answers them with dated evidence, which is what a reader in HR can weigh.
  • If unsure. A disagreement your evidence does not support is flagged and left out, so it cannot weaken the points that hold up.
  • What to avoid. No accusations of bias, no emotion and no named colleagues, with a pointer to HR or a lawyer if a legal issue is in play.

How to use it

  1. Press Fill in variables and type your details into each blank. What you type stays in this browser.
  2. Copy the filled prompt into the AI tool you already use, such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, or open it in the Grader or the Prompt Tester here.
  3. Before you rely on it, try it on three or four real examples. The Prompt Tester runs them all at once and shows which ones go wrong.
Use it from code

Get this prompt as JSON from the free REST API, with your own text in the blanks, or let an AI assistant fetch it through the MCP server. No key.

curl -s https://thinkhard.si/api/v1/prompts/respond-to-performance-review-disagreement

With the MCP server added to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or VS Code, call get_prompt with {"prompt": "respond-to-performance-review-disagreement"}, or just ask for it by name.