The prompt
Score 10 of 10, Excellent
Use it when Decision makers need a short, balanced brief on an issue, built from the research you have gathered, with the options and their trade-offs.
- {{audience}}
- {{issue}}
- {{author_org}}
- {{evidence}}
- {{options}}
- {{length}}
Full prompt and why it works
Prompt
Write a policy brief on the issue below, for {{audience}}, so that they can understand the problem, what the evidence shows and the options open to them in a single read. They have little time and are not specialists, so it should be plain and short. The issue and the decision being considered: {{issue}} Who the brief is from (our organization and its position, if it has one): {{author_org}} Research and evidence we have gathered, with sources: """ {{evidence}} """ Options already under discussion: {{options}} Length limit: {{length}} Use these headings: 1. Summary: the issue, the main finding and the options, in under 120 words. 2. The problem: what is happening, who is affected and how much, with figures and their sources. 3. What the evidence shows: the main findings, each with its source and how strong it is (several consistent studies, one study, expert opinion, or anecdote). 4. Options: a table with the columns Option, What it would do, Evidence it works, Costs and risks, Who is affected. Include doing nothing as an option. 5. Recommendation: only if our organization has a position; label it as our view and tie it to the evidence. 6. Sources: a numbered list. For example, the form of an evidence line: "Two city pilots found that text reminders cut missed appointments by about a fifth (sources 3 and 5); neither measured the cost." This shows the form only; use the real evidence. A good brief is one a decision maker who disagrees with our position would still find fair. Present the strongest evidence against each option as well as for it. Use only the evidence above; do not add statistics, studies or examples from memory. Say where evidence comes from a different country, population or time and may not apply here. If the evidence for an option is thin or missing, say so in the table rather than filling the cell.
Variables
- {{audience}}
- Who will read it, for example "city council members" or "the hospital board".
- {{issue}}
- The issue and the decision on the table, in a few sentences.
- {{author_org}}
- Your organization and its position, or "no position: options only".
- {{evidence}}
- The research, data and expert input you have, each item with its source.
- {{options}}
- Options already being discussed, or "none yet".
- {{length}}
- The length limit, for example "two pages" or "800 words".
Why it works
- What good looks like. The bar is a brief that a reader who disagrees with your position would still find fair, with the evidence against each option shown too.
- Format. An options table that includes doing nothing, with evidence, costs and who is affected, puts the trade-offs side by side.
- If unsure. Thin or missing evidence for an option is stated in the table instead of the cell being filled.