thinkhard.SI

Prompt repository Legal & compliance

Check an NDA before you sign it (not legal advice)

You need unusual or one-sided terms in an NDA flagged so you know what to ask about.

Registry no.
LEG-004
Collection
Legal & compliance
Laid out for
Claude
Score
10 out of 10
Blanks to fill
4
Added

Legal & complianceClaude

The prompt

Score 10 of 10, Excellent

Use it when You need unusual or one-sided terms in an NDA flagged so you know what to ask about.

  • {{nda_text}}
  • {{my_side}}
  • {{purpose_of_sharing}}
  • {{expectations}}
Full prompt and why it works
System prompt
You help people who are not lawyers read nondisclosure agreements before they sign. You explain what the text says, point out terms that bind one side more than the other or reach beyond confidentiality, and list questions for a qualified lawyer. You do not give legal advice, and you do not tell anyone whether to sign.
User message
<nda>
{{nda_text}}
</nda>

<my_situation>
My side: {{my_side}}
Why we are sharing information: {{purpose_of_sharing}}
What I expected the NDA to say: {{expectations}}
</my_situation>

Check the NDA above so that I know what to ask about before I sign. I am not a lawyer, and I will take your questions to one.

Use a numbered list in the order below, with the point as a short heading. For each, quote the clause with its number, say in one or two plain sentences what it means for me, and note whether it applies to both parties or only one:
1. Mutual or one-way: who must keep what secret.
2. What counts as confidential information, and what is excluded.
3. What I may do with the information and whom I may share it with (employees, advisors, affiliates), including any "residuals" clause that lets people use what they remember.
4. How long the obligations last, and whether any have no end date.
5. Returning or destroying information at the end.
6. What happens if a court or authority demands the information.
7. Remedies, penalties or fees for a breach.
8. Governing law and where disputes go.
9. Anything beyond confidentiality, such as non-solicitation, non-compete, exclusivity, ownership of ideas or feedback, or a duty to buy. These matter most, because people expect an NDA to be only about secrecy.

Then add:
- Differences from what I expected, each with the clause number.
- Points from the list that the NDA does not address, marked "Not addressed".
- Take to a qualified lawyer: up to 6 specific questions, most important first.

Keep the whole check under 700 words, in plain English, and explain any legal term you have to use. It should read as a calm, neutral explanation rather than a warning, and every point should match the clause it quotes.

<example>
The form of one point, with invented clause text: "4. Duration. Clause 6.1: 'The obligations in this Agreement continue for five (5) years from the Effective Date.' You must keep the information secret for five years from the date the NDA takes effect. Applies to both parties."
</example>

Describe one-sidedness as a fact about the text, for example "Clause 4 binds only the recipient; the discloser has no matching duty." Do not say whether a term is enforceable, normal or acceptable, and do not suggest replacement wording, because that depends on law and facts only a lawyer can weigh.

If a clause refers to a document or definition that is not included, or can be read two ways, say so and give both readings.

Variables

{{nda_text}}
The whole NDA, copied exactly with clause numbers.
{{my_side}}
Whether you mainly share information, receive it, or both, and your role, for example "freelance designer receiving a client's plans".
{{purpose_of_sharing}}
Why information is changing hands, for example "exploring a possible partnership".
{{expectations}}
What you assumed the NDA would say, for example "mutual, two years, nothing about hiring". Write "none" if you had no expectation.

Why it works

  • What to make. A fixed list of nine points, ending with terms that go beyond secrecy, makes sure a non-compete or ownership clause tucked into an NDA gets noticed.
  • What to avoid. One-sidedness is described as a fact about the text, never as a verdict on fairness or enforceability, which keeps the check on the right side of legal advice.
  • If unsure. Missing definitions and ambiguous clauses get both readings, which are exactly the questions to take to a lawyer.

How to use it

  1. Press Fill in variables and type your details into each blank. What you type stays in this browser.
  2. Copy the filled prompt into the AI tool you already use, such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, or open it in the Grader or the Prompt Tester here.
  3. Before you rely on it, try it on three or four real examples. The Prompt Tester runs them all at once and shows which ones go wrong.